evidoria

What works in Hong Kong

All catalogues · Hong Kong profile

6
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Hong Kong

Hong Kong has deployed several major digital and governance initiatives in recent years. The Smart Silver Digital Inclusion Programme has reached 150,000+ elderly residents since 2014, with plans to reach 45,000+ more in 2025–26 through HK$100 million in community digital support stations. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange's single-gender board ban reduced all-male boards from 32.9% of issuers in 2021 to roughly 3% by early 2025, raising women's board representation from 15% to 21.5%. On education and civil service, the University of Hong Kong funded HK$15.7 million in free ChatGPT-class access for all students and staff, while the government's HKPilot and HKMeeting tools scaled from 800 civil servants in November 2024 to roughly 50,000 across 100 departments by 2026, though outcome measurement has not yet been completed.

Drawn from: "Smart Silver" Digital Inclusion Programme for Elders · Hong Kong Stock Exchange's Single-Gender Board Ban (2022–2024) · University of Hong Kong — Redesigning Assessment Instead of Policing It in the GenAI Era · HKPilot & HKMeeting — Hong Kong's Generative-AI Tools for Civil-Service Document Drafting and Meeting Minutes · Hong Kong's Gazetted Water Gathering Grounds — Avoided-Cost Protection of Local Catchment · Hong Kong's Mandated & Government-Led Green Roof Programme

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Scalability & sustainability +17 pts 83 here · 66 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Governance, certification & transferability +12 pts 78 here · 66 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Transferability / replicability -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -18 pts 17 here · 35 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -36 pts 17 here · 53 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Transparency, ethics & data protection
100 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 80
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Scalability & sustainability
83 · 66
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Governance, certification & transferability
78 · 66
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Innovation level
60 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Transferability / replicability
50 · 59
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 35
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 60
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
17 · 53
Efficiency
0 · 52

Coloured bar: Hong Kong. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

"Smart Silver" Digital Inclusion Programme for Elders · 92

Hong Kong Stock Exchange's Single-Gender Board Ban (2022–2024) · 85

University of Hong Kong — Redesigning Assessment Instead of Policing It in the GenAI Era · 73

HKPilot & HKMeeting — Hong Kong's Generative-AI Tools for Civil-Service Document Drafting and Meeting Minutes · 53

Hong Kong's Gazetted Water Gathering Grounds — Avoided-Cost Protection of Local Catchment · 53

Hong Kong's Mandated & Government-Led Green Roof Programme · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more